The issue in civil engineering that
I would like to discuss is that of engineering companies scheming together to
rig bidding on public works projects.
There was one such incident recently that took place in two southern
states. The incident involved over 70
firms located in that region. What these
companies were doing was when a project would open up for bids, companies would
talk to each other, discuss who would get the job, then bid accordingly to keep
the prices high and the terms of the contract to their advantage. This gave the appearance that competitive
bidding was taking place, when in all reality they were rigging the system to
charge more money. Such behavior
violates not only the Code of Ethics for Engineers, but it is also in direct
violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act established in 1890.
There are many problems with the
conduct of these companies. They were
taking the competition out of bidding for these engineering projects. Competition drives progress. It also makes sure the work the company does
is of the highest quality and for the lowest possible price. These things among others are important for a
successful economy. The Sherman
Antitrust Act was established to maintain this competition. By placing predetermined bids on public
projects, they are purposely charging more than they think they could if they
were truly in a bidding war for the project.
This is essentially just stealing state and federal funds. Funds, I might add, that come from our tax
dollars. They also do not always uphold
the quality of work they otherwise would if competing with other companies to
keep the project. When the quality of
work is low and the project expensive, the civil engineering community quickly
loses legitimacy with the public.
Without public support for future projects, the future of the civil
engineering career field is not near as bright.
![]() |
http://ethics.tamu.edu/portals/3/Images/ethics.jpg |
The other side to this argument is
whether what these companies were doing is really wrong. Yes, it goes against the legal policies set
forth by our laws, but it also helped numerous projects get pushed through and
happen sooner. These projects create jobs
and help the economy. Some projects
require at least three bids before they are allowed to started. When one company bids on the project, but no
others want it, these companies consider it professional courtesy to put in
high bids just to get the project pushed through and create work for the fellow
engineers. One of the accused, and later
convicted, contractors involved in the scheme said this was an established
practice when he first showed up to the job years ago. He also said that although he was “uncomfortable”
taking part in the mentioned actions, he does not consider them illegal. In my opinion these are just excuses for not
following the ethics he should have internalized when he became an engineer. Laws are laws, and they need to be followed.
With the amount of responsibility civil
engineers have using public funds to create and maintain the infrastructure of
our nation, deviating from the laws is unacceptable. We need to do the right thing by creating competition
amongst companies to ensure the work we do is of the highest quality and for
the lowest price. The public’s safety is
at risk if we do not. Each and every
engineer should take it upon his or herself to uphold these standards and live
by the proper ethical code.
Information found on the ASCE website: http://www.asce.org/Ethics/A-Question-of-Ethics/2011/March-2011/